![]() Building from McCullen, this paper uses a quartet of federal court rulings from 20 involving anti-begging ordinances affecting the homeless as analytical springboards for examining these issues in depth. Supreme Court’s 2014 divided decision in McCullen v. The troubles were highlighted by the U.S. This paper examines numerous problems now plaguing the fundamental dichotomy in First Amendment jurisprudence between content-based and content-neutral speech regulations.The paper also contrasts the public policy concerns of libel-by-communism cases with the ones that animate the defamation-by-homosexuality disputes that are garnering significantly more scholarly attention.īegging the Question of Content-Based Confusion: Examining Problems With a Key First Amendment Doctrine Through the Lens of Anti-Begging Statutes Although some scholars seemingly presumed libel-by-communism to be a relic of the Cold War era, the issue is very much alive and well in ethnic enclaves. The paper uses three recent cases involving false accusations of communism targeting Vietnamese war refugees residing in the United States as analytical springboards for tackling this issue. This paper examines the complicated issues of community and defamatory meaning that arise in libel law when plaintiffs allege reputational harm within ethnic and geographically-bound micro-communities.Additionally, the implications of the EU’s law will be contrasted and theoretically applied to the U.S.ĭifficulties and Dilemmas Regarding Defamatory Meaning in Ethnic Micro-Communities: Accusations of Communism, Then and Now This paper will explore how the unregulated flow of information is being balanced with the innate desire for individual discretion. With the European Union’s introduction of the Right to be Forgotten, people are requesting to hide data and search engines are being forced to comply. The lack of privacy regulation remains a concern in the United States and abroad.So it’s cute, funny, and actually teaches players about a part of the US government that’s often overlooked.The Right to be Forgotten and Global Googling: A More Private Exchange of Information? ![]() We’d like to emphasize that Just Us Games has gone to a ridiculous amount of work to accurately represent each Supreme Court Justice based on their background, interviews, and political leanings. Inspired by the warm-hearted humor of Phoenix Wright, Supreme Courtship aims to not only provide an appealing, comical adventure, but also to teach people how the Supreme Court works. Spend time with young, stylish versions of real-life Justices both on and off the Court, and get an inside look at their personalities and ideologies. Throughout the course of the game, you’ll learn what a Justice actually does – and why it matters. Want to try the game in action? Download the free demo on PC or Mac and play through the first few chapters of the story! In Supreme Courtship, you take the role of a new and inexperienced Supreme Court Justice. Without a successful Kickstarter, this entertaining and educational game about the Judicial branch of government may never come to fruition. Right now it’s nearly halfway towards reaching its funding goal, and we need your help to get it over the finish line! This funding is vital for the two-person development team behind the game. Supreme Courtship, an educational comedy adventure game where you take on the role of a Supreme Court Justice, is nearing its deadline on Kickstarter, with only 10 days left in the campaign.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |